by C. O. Jones
Jon Corzine was a star, a shooting star: CEO
of Goldman Sachs, U. S.
Senator (D.NJ),
spending $62 Million of his own money in the 2000 election, recipient of the
coveted Enron
Prize for Distinguished Public Service in 2005, Governor of New Jersey in
2007, (another $38 Million). Corzine made things happen; he was a prince of the
revolving door.
Returning to the public sphere in March 2010, he was
appointed CEO and Chairman of MF Global, a
multinational futures broker and bond dealer. With experience, political
connections and a veteran of the revolving door, he was expected to turn around
this mid-level company with a struggling balance sheet.
Always known as a risk-taker, Corzine took personal control
of investment decisions and surreptitiously began buying European “sovereign
bonds,” i.e. he began betting on the bailout of troubled European economies.
“Accepted" accounting procedures for these nefarious
instruments allow profits to appear immediately after purchase of the bonds. Investors
began taking notice that the firm was making a profit, and stock prices rose;
but “customer” funds, as required by law, were kept aside.
The cycle was
augmented by pulling in funds from other sectors of the company through a
highly risky and discredited financial practice called “Internal
Repo.” This led to the inevitable
growing pyramid of profits: as long as the funds came in, more of these highly
risky derivatives could be purchased, which led to ever greater profits shown
on the books. With the funds leveraged to 40:1, staggering profits might be
realized with a swing of a mere 2 or 3%. This, of course, promised enormous
bonuses for Corzine. Conversely, a drop of 1 or 2% would produce margin calls
from J. P. Morgan, Global’s banker, and trouble for investors---but not for Jon
Corzine!
Finally, with Euro Bond holdings exceeding $6 Billion, word
started leaking out, investors became nervous, and the bubble burst. MF Global
now stands as the 8th
largest bankruptcy in US history. With $1.2 Billion in customer funds
“missing,” we speculate that the funds were slipped into margin calls.
Testifying under subpoena at a House Agriculture
Committee hearing, Corzine professed ignorance about the massive shortfall that
emerged as regulators and federal investigators began probing MF Global's Oct.
31 bankruptcy. Though several committee members still thanked Corzine for
opting not to cite his Fifth Amendment right to
avoid testifying, others appeared somewhat irritated by his carefully chosen
answers. Several described the financial jeopardy now faced by farmers and
other agriculture constituents who were MF Global customers.
This sad, troubling tale comes four short years after the
previous, massive collapse of the financial services industry, generated by
industry fraud, and bailed out by government and future taxpayers. The point here is that the nabobs who run this
industry know no bounds in greed and duplicity. The Obama administration has
not brought justice to the men who cooked up the myriad of fraudulent schemes
from the last mess, any more than it has brought Jon Corzine to justice. There have been no trials, no jail time. In
fact, the same people who brought down the world economy are still pulling the
strings, and claiming even greater salaries and bonuses than before the crisis.
In another, recent financial corruption case, United
States of America v. Carollo, Goldberg
and Grimm, a threesome of bit players on Wall Street got convicted of
obscure antitrust violations. This just-completed trial in downtown New
York against three faceless financial executives,
over 10 years in the making, allowed federal prosecutors to make public for the
first time the astonishing inner workings of the reigning American crime
syndicate, which now operates not out of Little Italy and Las
Vegas, but out of Wall Street.
The
defendants in the case – Dominick Carollo, Steven Goldberg and Peter Grimm –
worked for GE Capital, the finance arm of General Electric. Along with
virtually every major bank and finance company on Wall Street – not just GE,
but J.P. Morgan Chase, Bank of America, UBS, Lehman Brothers, Bear Stearns,
Wachovia and more – these three Wall Street thugs spent the past decade taking
part in a breathtakingly broad scheme to skim billions of dollars from the
coffers of cities and small towns across America. The banks secretly
colluded to rig the public bids on municipal bonds, a business worth $3.7
trillion. By conspiring to lower the interest rates that towns earn on these
investments, they stole from schools, hospitals, libraries and nursing homes –
from “virtually every state, district and territory in the United States,”
according to one settlement. And they did it so cleverly that the victims never
even knew they were being cheated. No thumbs were broken, and no cement
goulashes were recovered, but lots of money disappeared, and its manner of
disappearance had a familiar ring: organized crime.
In fact, stripped of all the camouflaging financial
verbiage, the crimes the defendants and their co-conspirators committed were
virtually indistinguishable from the kind of thuggery practiced for decades by
the Mafia, which has long made manipulation of public bids for things like
garbage collection and construction contracts a cornerstone of its business.
What’s more, in the manner of old mob trials, Wall Street’s secret machinations
were revealed during the Carollo trial through crackling wiretap
recordings and the lurid testimony of cooperating witnesses, who came into
court with bowed heads, pointing fingers at their accomplices. The new-age
gangsters even invented an elaborate code to hide their crimes. They spoke in
thieves’ cant, or as Italian mobsters talking about “getting a button man to
clip the capo.” On tape after tape these Wall Street crooks coughed up phrases
like “pull a nickel out” or “get to the right level” or “you’re hanging out
there” – all code words used to manipulate the interest rates on municipal
bonds. The only thing that made this trial different from a typical mob trial
was the scale of the crime.
Some progress is being made. Last month the SEC announced a $150 Million refund to Capital One credit card customers for abusive, misleading, even fraudulent lending practices. OK, this is nice, but it represents hardly even a wrist-slap to the managers who carry out this chicanery.
Some progress is being made. Last month the SEC announced a $150 Million refund to Capital One credit card customers for abusive, misleading, even fraudulent lending practices. OK, this is nice, but it represents hardly even a wrist-slap to the managers who carry out this chicanery.
On cue, the international system brings us TIBOR,
or LIBOR. This bank scandal is so large that Barclay’s Bank set aside $300
Million just for litigation. Fines for Barclay’s alone are near $500 Million.
This scandal involves massive collusion, among the largest banks, worldwide, to
manipulate interest rates (as in the Carollo case) to suit the individual
bank’s portfolio.
While the fines here may reflect the magnitude of the
crimes, the important factor is that Barclay’s share holders will shoulder the
burden of the penalties. Those who committed the crimes go scot-free. These
people belong in jail, for God’s sake, not idling around watching for the next
big opportunity for a killing. Our political leaders don’t have the gumption to
go after the criminals. We need new laws---a return to Glass Segal. We need
regulatory teeth to enforce our existing laws. Legislative injunctions to
prevent fraud and collusion are impossible because the bankers control our
politicians.
Millions in this country alone live in crushing poverty.
Scores of Einsteins and Mozarts live in squalor without a chance to present
their gifts to the world. Bankers, who contribute nothing, control our
politicians, travel the oceans in yachts and hide their millions/billions in
foreign tax havens. We need to be aware, my friends, of the faceless threat from
the reigning oligarchy that controls our country, our public dialog and us!
As we move toward what looks to be a pivotal election in November, consider the likely positions of our two candidates on confronting this threat to our democratic structure. We can conclude from the last 3 years that if re-elected, President Obama is unlikely to take dramatic steps to control the banks.
As we move toward what looks to be a pivotal election in November, consider the likely positions of our two candidates on confronting this threat to our democratic structure. We can conclude from the last 3 years that if re-elected, President Obama is unlikely to take dramatic steps to control the banks.
Mr. Romney, on the other hand, refuses to be specific on any policy issue. From what he does say, however, we can assume
that he will continue the trend of taking the teeth out of
regulatory agencies. Given that these are the only things that stand between
us and the rapacious bankers, we must conclude that under
his government this disturbing trend will continue unfettered. Take your pick.
C. O. Jones is a Robbinsense
staff writer
No comments:
Post a Comment